Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a score of 89 against 72.8. The Google Pixel 5 body is much newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it is a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a little larger display. Google Pixel 5 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.