Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a score of 77, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s global score of 72.8. LG G7 Fit is a notably newer and just a little bit lighter device than the Galaxy A7 (2016), although it is a little bit thicker. The LG G7 Fit features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a quite larger screen, a higher screen density and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG G7 Fit features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. LG G7 Fit features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution and a way better (4K) video resolution.
LG G7 Fit features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.