Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a general score of 82.7 against 72.8. Although the LG G8X ThinQ is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), it is heavier and thicker. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch. LG G8X ThinQ shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.