Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a global score of 82.5 against 72.8. LG V30S ThinQ's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), but it's just a little lighter. The LG V30S ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a better pixels density and a bit bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 112 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with more mega pixels. LG V30S ThinQ's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A7 (2016)'s battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.