Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a overall score of 81.3 against 72.8. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A7 (2016), but they have the same thickness. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, more pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back camera with more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Galaxy A7 (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.