Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than Galaxy A7 (2016), with an 81.2 score against 72.8. The LG V40 ThinQ design has the same weight than Galaxy A7 (2016), but it's just a little thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a larger screen and a higher screen density.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 48 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A7 (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.