Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 score. Motorola edge is a incredibly newer device than Galaxy A7 (2016), but it's heavier and way thicker. Motorola edge has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola edge features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola edge features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola edge features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Motorola edge has a very superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.