Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a general score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's body is much newer and just a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, although it is a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A7 (2016) has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a larger screen. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.