Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-04-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a general score of 88.9 against 72.8. The Motorola Moto G100 design is way newer, but noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). The Moto G100 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto G100 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G100 features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto G100 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Moto G100 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way more MP camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher 5760x3240 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.