Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), with a global score of 86.2 against 72.8. Although Moto G200 5G is way newer than Galaxy A7 (2016), it is thicker and heavier. The Moto G200 5G has a greater processing power than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. Moto G200 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Moto G200 5G has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.