Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-12-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s overall score of 72.8. Motorola Moto Z Force is a a little thinner and just a little lighter device than Galaxy A7 (2016), even when both were released with only 9 months difference. The Moto Z Force has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a same size display, the Moto Z Force also has a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM memory.
Moto Z Force counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video and a way higher video resolution. The Moto Z Force features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 6 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.