Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a score of 79.8 against 72.8. The Motorola One Hyper design is noticeably newer, but heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
Motorola One Hyper has a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One Hyper also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 21% larger battery capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.