Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), having an 80.7 score against 72.8. Although the Motorola One Vision is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), it's just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola One Vision counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Vision features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, a little bit higher pixels density and a quite larger screen. Motorola One Vision captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way better video definition, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Vision has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.