Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a overall score of 80 against 72.8. Although the Motorola One Zoom is notably newer than Galaxy A7 (2016), it's thicker and heavier. Motorola One Zoom features a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Zoom also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bigger display and a quite better screen pixels density. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 21% greater battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a back camera with way more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.