Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. The Motorola razr (2020) body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2016). The Motorola razr (2020) and Galaxy A7 (2016) feature extremely similar displays, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit lower 876 x 2142 resolution and a little inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) features superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.