Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a score of 97.6 against 72.8. Even though Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), it's just a little thinner and extremely newer. The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a much larger screen.
Galaxy Fold has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a greater processing power than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Fold features greater battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.