Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting an 87.7 score against 72.8. Galaxy M51's design is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it's way thicker and notably heavier. Galaxy M51 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy M51 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy M51 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display. Galaxy M51 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 112 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy M51 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.