Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s overall score of 72.8. Galaxy Note 20 is a newer device than the Galaxy A7 (2016), although it's thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a greater processing power than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy Note 20 has better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.