Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a overall score of 89.7 against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it is just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.