Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and thicker than Galaxy A7 (2016). Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a much more MP camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.