Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a 93.4 score against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer and just a little lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), but it is also a bit thicker. The Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 has a much sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a little higher number of pixels in each screen inch, a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger screen. Galaxy S22 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with way more MP and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.