Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a larger screen and a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a way better video quality, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.