Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-12-16 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a global score of 90.7 against 72.8. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and notably thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a way higher 200 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.