Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is much better than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 global score. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is a lot newer than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, although it is noticeably thicker and heavier. Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a little greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bigger aperture and a back camera with a lot higher 25 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.