Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), getting an 88.5 score against 72.8. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than Galaxy A7 (2016), it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Flip has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger display, a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Galaxy Z Flip shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and the Galaxy Z Flip count with really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.