Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), with a general score of 92.3 against 72.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A7 (2016). The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot better video resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy A7 (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.