Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a 94.6 score against 72.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is notably newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than Galaxy A7 (2016). Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior CPU than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a lot bigger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.