Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a 90.1 score against 72.8. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably newer device than Galaxy A7 (2016), although it's way thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bigger display, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite higher pixels number in each display inch.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.