Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s overall score of 72.8. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is extremely newer than Galaxy A7 (2016), it's heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 5020mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a way more MP back camera and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.