Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), with an 83 score against 72.8. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is incredibly newer than Galaxy A7 (2016), it is thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a little worse pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 48 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.