Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor 50 Pro has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. The Honor 50 Pro design has the same thickness than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is a bit heavier. Honor 50 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM.
The Honor 50 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger screen, a just a little higher pixel number per display inch and a higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px. Honor 50 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor 50 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a way more MP back-facing camera. The Honor 50 Pro has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.