Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-01-13 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. LG G7 Fit's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a little bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a greater display pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a little bit larger display. The LG G7 Fit shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG G7 Fit features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.