Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with an 80.9 score against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra design is much newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little higher count of pixels in each inch of screen, a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39% larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much higher 200 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.