Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017), having an 81.9 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a notably newer and a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is just a bit thicker. Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a better 1256 x 2760 resolution, a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way higher resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.