Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), with an 86.3 score against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body weights the same than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's a little bit thicker. Galaxy A7 (2017) features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite greater pixels count per inch of screen and a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way bigger aperture for better low light photography.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has greater battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.