Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 global score. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A7 (2017), it is just a little thicker and a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen and a bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments, a camera with a lot better resolution and a way better (4K) video definition. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.