Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with an 82.6 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's construction is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Moto G 5G Plus features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite higher pixels number in each inch in the display, a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Moto G 5G Plus has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.