Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), having a global score of 86.2 against 75.8. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is noticeably newer than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, but it's thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Moto G200 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a larger display.
Moto G200 5G has a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way better (4K) video definition. The Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.