Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-01-13 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. Even though the Moto Z Force and Galaxy A7 (2017) were released only a few months apart, the Moto Z Force is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) and Moto Z Force both count with really similar processors, because although the Moto Z Force has 4 less processing cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Moto Z Force has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a little better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Moto Z Force captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much higher resolution back camera, a larger aperture for better low light photos and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.