Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a score of 84.6 against 75.8. Even though Motorola One 5G is noticeably newer than Galaxy A7 (2017), it is thicker and heavier. The Motorola One 5G has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a bit greater display density. Motorola One 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way better video resolution.
The Motorola One 5G has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.