Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s score of 75.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is a little bit heavier. Galaxy A7 (2017) and Motorola razr (2020) count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 876 x 2142 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger aperture, a way higher video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.