Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s score of 75.8. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), it's extremely thinner and a lot newer. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera, a lot higher video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 31 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.