Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with a 75.8 score against 75.8. Although the nubia Red Magic 3S is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with way more MP and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.