Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has an overall score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s score of 75.8. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is a just a bit thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A7 (2017). OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of screen. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way better video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations and a way better resolution camera.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.