Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), having an 87.7 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is a lot newer, but thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). The Galaxy M51 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M51 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy M51 counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.