Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a global score of 98.9 against 75.8. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a greater number of pixels per inch of screen, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.