Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Galaxy Note 3's construction is a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), although it's just a little bit thicker and was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra GPU.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2017). Both have a same size screen, a greater pixels number in each inch in the display and an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a worse 13 megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much better video quality.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.