Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A7 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger display, a greater pixel count in each inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a larger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.