Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a 90.7 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and a lot lighter device than Galaxy A7 (2017). Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger display and a greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.