Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 386 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 score. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is incredibly newer, but way heavier and way thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2017). The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.